ADL

[Manu via Digitalmars-d]

On 5 September 2016 at 14:05, Manu <turkeyman at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I've seen this one. Again, we're not talking about C++. It hasn't been
> explored (to my knowledge) how a similar mechanism it would look and
> affect D. I suspect (with no evidence) it would be relatively benign
> by comparison to the problems ADL introduces to C++, and D stands to
> gain a lot more from the transaction, ie, UFCS will work in generic
> functions the same as non-generic functions. D requires this much more
> than C++ does, particularly when you take this as the direction of
> forward momentum for D design.

Anyway, I've made my case. I'm watching to see where this goes. I
don't really have anything to add, so I'll let it be from here.