colour lib needs reviewers

[Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d]

On 09/12/2016 12:14 AM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> I think I'm about as happy with my colour lib as I'm going to be.
> It really needs reviews.

Upon a quick look it seems to have the right amount of "notes", as 
Emperor Joseph II would say. Well balanced, nothing jumping at you. Nice 
work. Regarding Phobos suitability: One thing I'd like to hear from the 
community is the applicability of this work. I know very little about 
colors (only the RGB was familiar from HTML etc, but then there was no 
YUL), but that doesn't mean much. The library is quite isolated from the 
rest of Phobos, e.g. a stronger case would be made if there were some 
std.experimental.canvas package which uses the color package. Or at 
least a std.experimental.terminal package or something. A good case for 
inclusion would motivate the presence of the library as a catalyst for 
many user-level abstractions. -- Andrei