colour lib needs reviewers

[Manu via Digitalmars-d]

On 14 September 2016 at 04:25, Random D user via Digitalmars-d
<digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday, 13 September 2016 at 02:00:44 UTC, Manu wrote:
>>
>> On 13 September 2016 at 07:00, Marco Leise via Digitalmars-d
>> <digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Am Tue, 13 Sep 2016 00:37:22 +1000
>>> schrieb Manu via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d at puremagic.com>:
>>> Alright, but hybrid gamma is really not something that can be googled. Or
>>> rather I end up at Toyota's Gamma Hybrid product page. :D
>>
>>
>> True. I'm not even sure what the technical term for this sort of gamma
>> function is... I just made that up! :/
>> As Walter and others have asked, I'll have to start adding links to
>> reference material I guess, although that still feels really weird to
>> me for some reason.
>
>
> FWIW I stumbled into this while double-checking HDR standards for my
> previous post. (I'm not a HDR expert, only somewhat interested because it's
> the future of displays/graphics)
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hybrid_Log-Gamma

Perfect, thanks!