colour lib needs reviewers

[Meta via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 14 September 2016 at 20:14:48 UTC, Andrei 
Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 09/14/2016 09:47 AM, Meta wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 14 September 2016 at 13:28:23 UTC, Manu wrote:
>>> Cheers.
>>> Yeah, I need to do better with ddoc.
>>>
>>> ... I'm just gonna go on the record and say that I am really, 
>>> really
>>> not enjoying ddoc ;)
>>
>> I can't say I'm a fan either.
>
> Why? -- Andrei

The syntax is clunky and it's poorly documented. I've been 
lurking this mailing list since late 2012 and sporadically 
contributing since late 2013, and I had no idea you could do 
something like your example for Manu using DDOC. It seems like a 
real case of NiH syndrome; there are plenty of more widely used 
systems that would probably fit D just fine, but instead we have 
our own special macro documentation language. Really the only 
thing DDOC has going for it in comparison to something like 
Doxygen, IMO, is momentum. It's just too much of a pain to switch 
now.