dont understand this
rikki cattermole via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sat Sep 24 14:56:38 PDT 2016
On 25/09/2016 10:24 AM, collerblade wrote:
> fellow D programmers
>
> I would like to ask a question! I would like to create a class, which
> works in a separated thread, while the class exisit. This is important.
> I want to kill/terminate/stop the third whenn the class get cleared.
> Thas what i got so far. This is what i got so far (very easy solution):
>
> class MyClass {
> public:
> this() {
> Thread thread=new Thread(&threadFunc);
> running=true;
> thread.start();
> }
>
> ~this() {
> writeln(someVariable);
> running=false;
> }
>
> private:
> bool running=false;
> int someVariable=1;
>
> void threadFunc() {
> while(running) {
> someVariable++;
> }
> }
> }
>
> Becouse core.thread.Thread doesnt have any stop,pause,therminate method
> i have to stop the thread by myself (with the help of the running
> variable). The problem is: this ISNT WORKING. The reason is: the
> destructor never gets called, so the thread runs forever (application
> didnt exit). So the GC finds somewhere a pointer to the class's instance
> memory (which is ok i think, becouse i use delegate to create the thread).
> But imagagine this: when i change the running variable to static,
> everything works as expected, and the app frees and closes normally. Why
> is the running variable is different from the other someVariable??
> Before u ask:
> - "shared bool running" doesnt works, only static.
> - Tried to keep a reference of the Thread as a local variable, result is
> the same
> - i tried 1000 times the code on 2 different PC, result is the same (no
> random pointer somewhere)
> - i use latest LDC
>
> Obviously, i want to avoid a static running variable, my class can have
> multiple instances.
>
> Ty Collerblade
threadFunc contains a reference to MyClass in the form of the 'this'
pointer and so the GC sees this and never deallocates the MyClass
instance to begin with.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list