Unum II announcement

[Nick B via Digitalmars-d]

On Saturday, 24 September 2016 at 12:56:48 UTC, Andrei 
Alexandrescu wrote:

>
> From what I read in the freely-available materials on Unum 
> (actually I also skimmed the book) it seems to me Unum is 
> predicated on a hardware implementation. It seems there would 
> be little interest in a slow software emulation. -- Andrei

Andrei

I suggest that now, programmers would/may have a choice: be slow 
and correct, or fast and incorrect, and that would depend if real 
accuracy is important or not, the types of problems being work 
on, and cost of failure. (see examples in John Powerpoint 
presentation).

But I will ask John G, on the types of users showing interest in 
UNUMS.

Nick