Required DMD changes for Mir and few thoughts about D future

[Temtaime via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 27 September 2016 at 01:17:16 UTC, Andrei 
Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 9/27/16 2:52 AM, Joakim wrote:
>> Why not?  I think people will understand that ldc is meant for 
>> higher
>> performance, which you want from such code anyway.
>
> I'm not going to argue this much further. Essentially Mir is 
> touted as a highly generic and portable library. Having it only 
> work on one language implementation works against that 
> statement, the credibility of Mir, and the credibility of D as 
> an universal platform for creating fast code.

Just let dmd die.