Required DMD changes for Mir and few thoughts about D future

[Guillaume Piolat via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 27 September 2016 at 01:17:16 UTC, Andrei 
Alexandrescu wrote:
> I'm not going to argue this much further. Essentially Mir is 
> touted as a highly generic and portable library. Having it only 
> work on one language implementation works against that 
> statement, the credibility of Mir, and the credibility of D as 
> an universal platform for creating fast code.

Isn't it just a matter of adding "version(LDC)" around the more 
optimized blocks?
Having it work in DMD, however slower, is good enough.