Required DMD changes for Mir and few thoughts about D future
Ilya Yaroshenko via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Tue Sep 27 03:48:40 PDT 2016
On Tuesday, 27 September 2016 at 10:44:28 UTC, Guillaume Piolat
wrote:
> On Tuesday, 27 September 2016 at 01:17:16 UTC, Andrei
> Alexandrescu wrote:
>> I'm not going to argue this much further. Essentially Mir is
>> touted as a highly generic and portable library. Having it
>> only work on one language implementation works against that
>> statement, the credibility of Mir, and the credibility of D as
>> an universal platform for creating fast code.
>
> Isn't it just a matter of adding "version(LDC)" around the more
> optimized blocks?
> Having it work in DMD, however slower, is good enough.
50 times slower for modern CPUs.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list