Module names shadowing defined functions/templates.

[Minty Fresh via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 29 September 2016 at 02:26:15 UTC, Joakim wrote:
> I ran into this too, it is annoying. I think you're supposed to 
> use different names.

It's a rather painful limitation if that were the case.
Going with the example I gave, what would an alternative name for 
the module be? All it's public members are named `leastsq`.

While I can imagine there are technical challenges that have 
caused this issue to be the way it is, it's still a pretty major 
flaw to try to work around.

Working around shortcomings of a language is never a good place 
to be in.