Is it acceptable to not parse unittest blocks when unittests are disabled ?

[Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d]

On 4/1/2017 12:39 AM, Stefan Koch wrote:
> This should be optional and controlled via a switch like --fast-parse ?

Too many switches are a disease, and we already have an awful lot.

The non-parsing of unittests have been there for quite a while now, and have not 
caused any trouble. I see that as good evidence we're on a good path with this.