Proposal: Exceptions and @nogc

[Kagamin via Digitalmars-d]

On Monday, 3 April 2017 at 14:27:47 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
> I don't know if you've been following some of the discussions 
> here and on Learn, but there are a couple of people now 
> link-hacking druntime completely out of their binaries in order 
> to avoid implicit GC calls and implicit copying.

I suppose they link-hack GC, not druntime. If they want to remove 
druntime, they can just not link with it in the first place: no 
druntime, nothing to remove. That's what I do, but never heard of 
implicit copying.