Exceptions in @nogc code

[Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 4 April 2017 at 09:45:14 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> 6. reducing the amount of GC garbage created is good, but does 
> not solve the problem of "I don't want to use D because of the 
> GC".

I betcha D would be a better language with more users if you just 
told those people "sorry, it isn't for you then" and focused on 
improving what we already have.

I've never had a problem using D without a GC as it is now BTW. 
But that's because I'm more interested in getting work done than 
in endlessly whining about a language I don't even actually use 
or understand in Reddit comments.