Proposal: Exceptions and @nogc

[Kagamin via Digitalmars-d]

On Monday, 3 April 2017 at 15:16:31 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
> On Monday, 3 April 2017 at 14:36:43 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
>> I suppose they link-hack GC, not druntime.
>
> Nope, they get rid of everything, see 
> https://theartofmachinery.com/2016/12/18/d_without_runtime.html

That article is pretty careful:
>As an example
>as if it were C code to begin with
>Even then, there are useful compromises between the extremes of 
>“no D runtime” and “full D runtime”.
Also see the next post 
https://theartofmachinery.com/2017/01/24/boot_to_d.html - not 
exactly GC purity.
Also the removed parts there are not runtime, but compiler 
generated stuff added to the object file that would need runtime, 
like reference to the personality function.