Exceptions in @nogc code

[H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d]

On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 02:07:52PM -0700, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On 4/6/2017 1:23 PM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 12:54:40PM -0700, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> > > On 4/6/2017 6:32 AM, deadalnix wrote:
> > > > It was specified to a fairly good extent in the lifetime ML
> > > > (especialy the scope part, was specified in extreme details) and
> > > > got ignored.
> > > 
> > > When referencing previous discussions, please include a link.
> > > Having people guess at where such discussion took place (github?
> > > wiki?  bugzilla? n.g.?  IRC? DConf?), and which thread it might
> > > be, is not helpful. The last time upthread I tried to find one
> > > such you referred to I came up empty-handed.
> > 
> > Try this for starters:
> > 
> > 	https://forum.dlang.org/thread/kpgilxyyrrluxpepepcg@forum.dlang.org?page=1
> 
> deadalnix?

You were asking for a link to deadalnix's original discussion, and
that's the link I found (somebody else also posted a link to the same
discussion).

He also alluded to the "lifetime ML", I'm not 100% sure but I think he
may have been referring to these discussions (or related ones in the
same mailing list):

	http://forum.dlang.org/thread/56301A8C.1060808@erdani.com

(Sorry I couldn't pull up a more specific link, my office network's
corporate firewall has completely hosed SSL negotiations so google
doesn't work anymore as they've switched to SSL by default.)


T

-- 
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.