CTFE Status 2

Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sat Apr 15 04:04:39 PDT 2017


On Saturday, 15 April 2017 at 10:30:57 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote:
> On Saturday, 15 April 2017 at 10:10:54 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
>> On Thursday, 16 February 2017 at 21:05:51 UTC, Stefan Koch 
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Guys, due to the old CTFE status thread getting to page 
>>> 30, I am now starting a new one.
>>>
>>> [...]
>>
>> The llvm backend is back in a fully working state.
>> It's about 2times slower in my then my interpreter ;)
>
> Huh. In all cases, or only in trivial ones? Because I would 
> have expected the overhead of jitting to become less relevant 
> the more complex stuff you interpret vs jit.

It's an average number.
on tests the represent the usual usage of ctfe.



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list