DIP 1005 - Preliminary Review Round 1

[Andrej Mitrovic via Digitalmars-d]

On Sunday, 23 April 2017 at 12:03:47 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
wrote:
> Mostly out of a sense of conformity. We asked Michael to give 
> no special treatment of DIPs originating from us, and this one 
> was open, so he put it up for review. It is likely it will end 
> up rejected in favor of 
> https://github.com/dlang/druntime/pull/1756.

Wouldn't there be a compile-time performance impact from 
instantiating so many templates, virtually for every parameter 
who's type is defined in another module?