[OT] Generative C++

[12345swordy via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 3 August 2017 at 19:02:17 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
> On 03.08.2017 20:32, 12345swordy wrote:
>> On Thursday, 3 August 2017 at 10:43:50 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, 2 August 2017 at 20:28:38 UTC, 12345swordy 
>>> wrote:
>>>> ...No? I was referring to the c++ proposal paper.
>>>
>>> The paper doesn't propose to enforce coding standards to the 
>>> point you want. D already does what the paper proposes.
>> Page 2:
>> 
>> "Enable writing
>> compiler-enforced
>> patterns for any purpose:
>> coding standards
>> (e.g., many
>> Core Guidelines
>> “enforce” rules)
>> "
>> 
>> Yes, it does, right there. Are you reading the same paper that 
>> I am?
>
> On 02.08.2017 15:50, 12345swordy wrote:
>>   > Is it to much to ask for d developers to provide a way to 
>> enforce custom
>> coding standards in a similar fashion that @nogc and @safe 
>> does?
>
> How would you use the proposed features to implement @safe or 
> @nogc within C++?

I am not interested in arguing about what I said or I didn't 
said. Regardless what you asking is ridiculous, as 1.) there is 
no gc exist in c++ in the first place 2.)it's still a concept at 
this point of time which may be rejected in the future.