[OT] Generative C++

Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Thu Aug 3 12:45:12 PDT 2017


On 03.08.2017 21:28, 12345swordy wrote:
> On Thursday, 3 August 2017 at 19:02:17 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
>> On 03.08.2017 20:32, 12345swordy wrote:
>>> On Thursday, 3 August 2017 at 10:43:50 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
>>>> On Wednesday, 2 August 2017 at 20:28:38 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
>>>>> ...No? I was referring to the c++ proposal paper.
>>>>
>>>> The paper doesn't propose to enforce coding standards to the point 
>>>> you want. D already does what the paper proposes.
>>> Page 2:
>>>
>>> "Enable writing
>>> compiler-enforced
>>> patterns for any purpose:
>>> coding standards
>>> (e.g., many
>>> Core Guidelines
>>> “enforce” rules)
>>> "
>>>
>>> Yes, it does, right there. Are you reading the same paper that I am?
>>
>> On 02.08.2017 15:50, 12345swordy wrote:
>>>   > Is it to much to ask for d developers to provide a way to enforce 
>>> custom
>>> coding standards in a similar fashion that @nogc and @safe does?
>>
>> How would you use the proposed features to implement @safe or @nogc 
>> within C++?
> 
> I am not interested in arguing about what I said or I didn't said. 

I don't understand the relevance of this sentence.

> Regardless what you asking is ridiculous, as 1.) there is no gc exist in 
> c++ in the first place
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boehm_garbage_collector

> 2.)it's still a concept at this point of time 
> which may be rejected in the future.

How does that make my question ridiculous?


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list