@safe(bool)

[Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d]

On 22.08.2017 21:46, 12345swordy wrote:
> On Tuesday, 22 August 2017 at 19:24:08 UTC, bitwise wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 22 August 2017 at 00:33:17 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>> [...]
>>> If you need an IDE to figure out what your code is doing, that's an 
>>> epic fail IMHO. Walter has made similar statements on several occasions.
>>
>> There was a time that people would write code with even modest 
>> performance requirements in assembler for fear of what the compiler 
>> would spit out, but that's in the past, as is the notion of trying to 
>> develop without an IDE.
> 
> You shouldn't rely on an IDE to compensate poor language design. That is 
> coming from a guy who prefers IDE's.

I disagree with both the notion that this is poor language design and 
that an IDE is required to make sense out of code that uses the new feature.