Editor recommendations for new users.

[Jerry via Digitalmars-d]

On Sunday, 27 August 2017 at 18:08:52 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote:
>> The requirements are rather vague, you can interpret it in a 
>> number of ways.
>
> The sensible interpretation imho is "as low an install 
> footprint as possible while still fulfilling the other 
> requirements". I'm not aware of anything below ~20MB install 
> footprint that fulfills the other requirements, but I'd be 
> interested if you know any.

The install requirement is arbitrary, and why 20MB? It just seems 
like you are trying to advertise that program for some reason.

>> I wouldn't consider 200MB gigantic in comparison to 20MB cause 
>> there is literally no difference of use for me.
>
> The thread is about OP's requirements.

So replace me with anyone.

>> You'd have to have a really shitty laptop for it to be an 
>> issue.
>
> Not relevant.

It is relevant, shit, even with a shitty laptop you can upgrade 
the hdd and then it becomes a non-issue anyways.