Question on Dual-Licensing Some Code for Phobos
codephantom
me at noyb.com
Sat Dec 2 05:15:50 UTC 2017
On Saturday, 2 December 2017 at 05:05:14 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
> On Saturday, 2 December 2017 at 02:35:18 UTC, codephantom wrote:
>> Just the fact that you've seen that source code, is enough to
>> have already 'contaminated' you with that source code's
>> licence, and, that could (potentially)constitute your work as
>> being a derivative work.
>
> To that I say "prove it in court" :)
What if I can afford the best intellectual property rights
lawyers on the planet.
You best start saving ;-)
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list