Question on Dual-Licensing Some Code for Phobos

codephantom me at noyb.com
Sat Dec 2 05:15:50 UTC 2017


On Saturday, 2 December 2017 at 05:05:14 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
> On Saturday, 2 December 2017 at 02:35:18 UTC, codephantom wrote:
>> Just the fact that you've seen that source code, is enough to 
>> have already 'contaminated' you with that source code's 
>> licence, and, that could (potentially)constitute your work as 
>> being a derivative work.
>
> To that I say "prove it in court" :)

What if I can afford the best intellectual property rights 
lawyers on the planet.

You best start saving ;-)



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list