@ctfeonly

[Walter Bright]

On 12/7/2017 5:20 PM, Manu wrote:
> Right, but that's what I'm saying; using your solution of putting a function in 
> a module that's not compiled to inhibit code generation won't inhibit people 
> from *attempting* to making runtime calls (and getting link errors)... whereas a 
> compile error trying to runtime-call a function that shouldn't be runtime-called 
> might be more desirable.

That's exactly what happens if you put a declaration in a .h file, call the 
function, and don't link in the implementation. I don't see the difference.