D build and SCons [was Answers needed from those using D for Web Development, Web APIs and Services]

[Russel Winder]

On Sun, 2017-12-24 at 13:27 +0000, bachmeier via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> 
[…]
> I like SCons. Do any of the others have advantages over SCons?

That is a moot point. For me SCons is the tool of choice when I am not
using Meson.

> The Python dependency IME does complicate things because it's not 
> trivial to get it working on Windows. It's been too long to 
> remember specifics, but it was an adventure, and if I've got a 
> working D installation, why am I messing around with Python?

Python being hard to install on Windows has been over since Python 3.4.
A lot of effort went into making Python installation really easy.
Python 3.6 should provide no problems. I am not sure Chocolately does
as good a job is using the official installer. But as a Linux user I
have no personal evidence.

-- 
Russel.
===========================================
Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200
41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077
London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20171224/1430b406/attachment.sig>