Maybe D is right about GC after all !

[Timon Gehr]

On 27.12.2017 16:37, rjframe wrote:
> If the programmer opts-in to those checks... it's a +1 for pragmatism but
> does make marketing the language a bit weird -- one-liners spawn
> objections to the integrity of the claim (such as a portion of this
> thread; if there are objections within the community, how much more will
> we find objections outside it!).

Frankly, I can see no need to appeal to people who think that having a 
culture where people feel free to question claims they consider dubious 
somehow reflects badly on the community or the language (hint: it's the 
opposite).