Maybe D is right about GC after all !

Thu Dec 28 05:06:12 UTC 2017

On Thursday, 28 December 2017 at 04:49:04 UTC, Walter Bright 
wrote:
> On 12/27/2017 8:29 AM, Russel Winder wrote:
>> This does not support the original claim that the design of D 
>> by you is
>> based on psychology. It may be based on your perception of 
>> other
>> programmers needs, which is fine per se, but that is not 
>> psychology-
>> based design.
>
> All programming language design is based on human factors, i.e. 
> psychology. If it was purely computer science based, it would 
> be in binary.

01100010 01110101 01110100 00100000 01001001 00100000 01100011 
01100001 01101110 00100000 01110011 01110000 01100101 01100001 
01101011 00100000 01100010 01101001 01101110 01100001 01110010 
01111001 00100000 01101010 01110101 01110011 01110100 00100000 
01100110 01101001 01101110 01100101 00100001