What do you want to see for a mature DLang?

[Neia Neutuladh]

On Friday, 29 December 2017 at 07:53:51 UTC, IM wrote:
>    -- Better compiler errors, better compiler errors, better 
> compiler errors.

Very much so.

I actually made a list a day or two ago. Some of it is more 
speculative than concrete, though:

* unicode categories to determine what can be an identifier 
(there's no reason not to support, say, Canadian aboriginal 
syllabaries; it would just be too much work to list out each 
range of glyphs)
* concepts / compile-time interfaces (makes ranges easier to deal 
with and document)
* @safe by default
* function parameters are const scope by default (I recall this 
was a major request when const was first introduced)
* mixin templates (a template designed to be mixed in is likely 
not to work if simply invoked; this also gets us most of what 
people have been asking for with macros)
* possibly, block syntax for functions and templates whose last 
parameter is a function or alias