memcpy() comparison: C, Rust, and D

[Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d]

On 2/1/2017 1:47 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> At the rate D is going, pretty soon the entire function body will be retold in
> the signature. What's the point when it is obvious that in practice, we can
> actually analyze the content and get BETTER coverage anyway?

It already does this for templates and function literals.

It's not really possible for C headers :-)