Workaround for DIP 1005

Dominikus Dittes Scherkl via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Fri Feb 3 08:10:52 PST 2017


On Friday, 3 February 2017 at 14:59:09 UTC, rikki cattermole 
wrote:
> On 04/02/2017 3:43 AM, Dominikus Dittes Scherkl wrote:
>> DIP 1005 provides new syntax to make it possible to avoid 
>> global imports.
>> But this can already be worked around with some nice trick:
>> Any thoughts?
>
> Needless syntax sugar:
?!?
What is syntactic sugar?
I did NOT propose any new syntax - my workaround already works 
with the current D language. In fact I think DIP1005 is syntactic 
sugar (maybe even "needless").


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list