Name That Technique!

[deadalnix via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 3 February 2017 at 23:33:58 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> I agree, it's pretty dazz! We need to give this technique a 
> memorable name (not an acronym). I thought "Voldemort Types" 
> turned out rather well, whereas CTFE is klunky, UFCS is even 
> worse. The absolute worst is C++ SFINAE.
>
> Any ideas?
>
>   Scherkl-Nielsen Lookup?
>
> The perfect bikeshedding moment!
>
> Daniel, Dominikus: please consider writing an article about 
> this.

That's obviously a self important lookup.