Name That Technique!

[David Gileadi via Digitalmars-d]

On 2/3/17 5:00 PM, deadalnix wrote:
> On Friday, 3 February 2017 at 23:33:58 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
>> I agree, it's pretty dazz! We need to give this technique a memorable
>> name (not an acronym). I thought "Voldemort Types" turned out rather
>> well, whereas CTFE is klunky, UFCS is even worse. The absolute worst
>> is C++ SFINAE.
>>
>> Any ideas?
>>
>>   Scherkl-Nielsen Lookup?
>>
>> The perfect bikeshedding moment!
>>
>> Daniel, Dominikus: please consider writing an article about this.
>
> That's obviously a self important lookup.

This. So much this.