syntax sugar: std.path::buildPath instead of from!"std.path".buildPath

[Jack Stouffer via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 14 February 2017 at 19:08:53 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
> I am not familiar with all of the past discussion of this 
> issue, but something that I have wondered is why we can't do 
> something like

Because at that point, it's no longer a set of lego's being put 
together (design by introspection) which build a larger whole. 
It's the genericism problem of requiring a name for everything.

At the end of the day this would actually make constraints less 
*verbose*, but more *complicated*.