D future ...
Cym13 via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Wed Feb 15 11:47:28 PST 2017
On Wednesday, 15 February 2017 at 16:07:18 UTC, Ola Fosheim
> I think Go has benefitted some from having limited and stable
> language semantics and continuously improving on the
> implementation. IMO that should make it attractive in the
> server space, i.e. you get low tooling-related maintenance cost
> and still get real benefits from recompiling with new versions
> of the compiler.
That is a very good point, I had never considered the
semantics stabilization on tooling. It strenghtens (along with
my opinion that D is fine as it is and that no new feature should
added before at least two years, while fixing the implementation
get the focus. It doesn't mean we can't add anything new, better
integration or memory management semantics would be fine, as long
is an already begun project.
There's little point in having more features if what's already
half broken and not well-defined.
More information about the Digitalmars-d