If you needed any more evidence that memory safety is the future...

[Jack Stouffer via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 24 February 2017 at 15:15:00 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad 
wrote:
> I don't really buy into the idea that a single language has to 
> cover all bases.

Neither do I. But, the progenitor of that idea is that languages 
have understood use-cases, and that using them outside of those 
areas is non-optimal.

I've come to believe that any program that handles personal user 
data made in a language without memory safety features is not 
only non-optimal, but irresponsible.