If you needed any more evidence that memory safety is the future...

[Chris Wright via Digitalmars-d]

On Sat, 25 Feb 2017 22:12:13 +0100, Timon Gehr wrote:

> On 25.02.2017 15:38, Chris Wright wrote:
>> On Sat, 25 Feb 2017 13:23:03 +0100, Timon Gehr wrote:
>>> If 'disable' (as can be reasonably expected) means the compiler will
>>> behave as if they were never present, then it does not.
>>
>> https://dlang.org/dmd-linux.html#switch-release
>>
>>
> This literally says "[...] assertion failures are undefined behaviour".

...

It says it doesn't emit code for assertions.

Then it says assertion failures are undefined behavior.

How does that even work?

> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias

Fuck you.