If you needed any more evidence that memory safety is the future...

Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sat Feb 25 20:00:02 PST 2017


On 02/25/2017 04:49 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
>
> It says it doesn't emit code for assertions.
>
> Then it says assertion failures are undefined behavior.
>
> How does that even work?
>

Obviously the would-be failure. No need for the docs to be pedantic 
about everything. It'd read like the average RFC, for the few people who 
would bother trying to read it.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list