Voting for std.experimental.checkedint

[rumbu via Digitalmars-d]

On Saturday, 25 February 2017 at 15:21:10 UTC, Andrei 
Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 02/25/2017 10:17 AM, rumbu wrote:
>> A lot of bloat code for something extremely basic.
>
> If you can do it with less code, I'm all ears. Thanks! -- Andrei

This was not about coding skills, was about usability. The module 
contains too many options and failure scenarios instead of a 
simple default behavior.

Considering that in most languages with integrated overflow 
checking, the default behavior is throwing some kind of exception 
(Ada, C#, Pascal, Rust, Swift), this one must be at least 
highlighted at the top of the documentation.