DIP10005: Dependency-Carrying Declarations is now available for community feedback

[Chris Wright via Digitalmars-d]

On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 08:10:04 +0000, Joakim wrote:
> Except that almost nobody has argued against local imports. Rather, the
> argument is that local imports mostly solved this problem, so why bother
> adding new syntax for the dozen remaining symbols from 2-3 modules that
> are commonly used in template constraints?

That was my misunderstanding, and it only applied to the speed argument 
anyway.

This is usable with top-level functions, top-level templates, and classes 
with inheritance.