CTFE Status

[Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 17 January 2017 at 22:19:39 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
> On Tuesday, 17 January 2017 at 22:11:21 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
>> Not really, I still use a fallback to the old interpreter for 
>> the unimplemented features.
>
> Does this mean that the newCTFE branch is usable now? And that 
> I get performance improvements for the expression nodes you 
> have implemented in newCTFE but not for the others?

Exactly. Modulo bugs of course.
If you have code gives you a different output with my engine then 
with the old one, please open an issue in my github repo.