Catching Errors
Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Fri Jan 20 06:22:23 PST 2017
On Friday, 20 January 2017 at 07:50:23 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> That doesn't work well with a unit test framework that want to
> catch assertions to be able to continue with other tests.
I'd suggest writing a new assert handler for your framework that
does something different, then you can get a bit more control
over it.
Though, the built in assert is underpowered regardless... oh, how
I wish it even had the convenience of C's assert, but I really
want it to go a step further and show the values as well as the
code that is failing.
int a = 0;
int b = 1;
assert(a == b);
Assertion `a == b` failed: test.d(3)
a = 0
b = 1
I know unit test frameworks tend to offer their own functions to
get closer to this but it'd be compelling to me if it just worked
with the built in too.
Oh well, that's not today, but doing your own assert handler that
just prints and continues, or prints and aborts the current test
while continuing with the next or something like that is doable
and perhaps useful.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list