CTFE Status

John Colvin via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Tue Jan 24 01:27:52 PST 2017


On Tuesday, 24 January 2017 at 06:35:56 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
> And the second one is the "to" template from std.conv;
> Because of the aforementioned UTF issues.
>
> NOTE: that the blacklist is by nature transitive meaning a 
> function that calls a blacklisted function will also not be 
> interpreted by newCTFE

`to` is so common that I suspect you'll see a wave of bugs when 
you fix the UTF issues, yes?

Either way, thanks for spending so much time on this, I'm excited 
about these improvements both from a professional and personal 
standpoint.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list