CTFE Status

Nordlöw via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Tue Jan 24 07:16:29 PST 2017


On Tuesday, 24 January 2017 at 14:16:10 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
> There will be NO permanence improvement for pegged.
> For the 7th time.
>
> It is bogged down by templates, ctfe is not the problem there.

Sorry for that. Got it.

What's the essence of this suboptimal performance when using 
templates?

Non-O(1) lookup times?

Mangling?


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list