A safer File.readln

[Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d]

On 01/25/2017 12:58 AM, TheGag96 wrote:
> On Monday, 23 January 2017 at 13:18:57 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> On 1/23/17 5:44 AM, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
>>> If, instead of increasing its size by 100%, we increase it by a smaller
>>> percentage of its previous size, we still maintain the amortized O(1)
>>> cost (with a multiplier that might be a little higher, but see the trade
>>> off). On the other hand, we can now reuse memory.
>>
>> Heh, I have a talk about it. The limit is the golden cut,
>> 1.6180339887498948482... The proof is fun. Anything larger prevents
>> you from reusing previously used space. -- Andrei
>
> Andrei, could you link this talk? Thanks!

Not public. -- Andrei