`in` no longer same as `const ref`

Nordlöw via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sun Jan 29 03:50:49 PST 2017


On Sunday, 29 January 2017 at 11:49:19 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
> https://github.com/dlang/druntime/pull/1748/files
>
> Why is `in` no longer the same as `const ref`?

Correction:

Why is `in` no longer the same as `const scope`?


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list