`in` no longer same as `const ref`

Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Mon Jan 30 05:57:10 PST 2017


On Monday, 30 January 2017 at 00:26:27 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> I was afraid that by checking it, too much code would break.

Code that was using it improperly was *already* broken. Now, the 
compiler will simply tell them, at compile time, why instead of 
letting it silently accept undefined behavior.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list