Why do "const inout" and "const inout shared" exist?
ag0aep6g via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sat Jul 1 16:16:13 PDT 2017
On 07/01/2017 11:47 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Walter looked at http://erdani.com/conversions.svg and said actually
> "const inout" and "const inout shared" should not exist as distinct
> qualifier groups, leading to the simplified qualifier hierarcy in
> http://erdani.com/conversions-simplified.svg.
This may be a stupid question, but those graphs say: inout -> const, but
inout may stand for shared and there's no shared -> const.
How can inout -> const be allowed while shared -> const is forbidden?
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list