Why is phobos so wack?

[Dukc via Digitalmars-d]

On Sunday, 9 July 2017 at 22:20:02 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> Eh, that's not really why... this is just a crappy 
> implementation. We can do a lot better with the library and a 
> lot better with the compiler without losing any of the 
> genericness.

But the more powerful the generics are, the harder it is to make 
good messages, that's what I'm saying. And that compared to the 
power of our metaprogramming, the messages aren't that bad after 
all.

But I agree D can, and I believe will, imporove there regardless.