An Issue I Wish To Raise Awareness On

Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Tue Jul 18 12:24:18 PDT 2017


On Tuesday, July 18, 2017 18:06:56 Atila Neves via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Tuesday, 18 July 2017 at 15:03:07 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 18 July 2017 at 11:47:37 UTC, Petar Kirov
> >
> > [ZombineDev] wrote:
> >> I think Atila was talking about this one:
> >> struct A
> >> {
> >>
> >>    ~this() {}
> >>
> >> }
> >>
> >> void main()
> >> {
> >>
> >>    auto a = A();
> >>    shared b = A();
> >>
> >> }
> >
> > This is strange. There's nothing that suggests that struct A
> > and its destructor is thread-safe, yet compiler assumes it is.
>
> Except for a programmer explicitly and manually calling the
> destructor (in which case, don't), the destructor is only ever
> called by one thread.

It could still be a problem if the struct has a member variable that is a
reference type, because then something else could refer to that object, and
if it's shared, then you would need to protect it, and the operations that
shared prevents should still be prevented. For full-on value types, it
should be a non-issue though.

- Jonathan M Davis



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list