struct constructors and destructors.

SrMordred via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Wed Jul 19 07:19:30 PDT 2017


On Wednesday, 19 July 2017 at 14:09:32 UTC, SrMordred wrote:
> On Wednesday, 19 July 2017 at 09:09:40 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 19 July 2017 at 07:48:28 UTC, Danni Coy wrote:
>>> Is there a reason that the following code
>>>
>>> struct Foo
>>> {
>>>     this (string name)
>>>     { do_something(name); }
>>>
>>>     ~this()
>>>     { undo_something(); }
>>> }
>>>
>>> Foo foo = void;
>>>
>>> void open()
>>> {
>>>     foo = Foo("test"); // <- this line
>>> }
>>>
>>> tries to OpAssign foo to itself then calls foo's destructor?
>>
>> What happens is this.
>>
>> void open()
>> {
>>   foo = () {
>>   Foo _tmp = Foo.__ctor("test");
>>   return _tmp;
>>   } ();
>> }
>
> Hm, isnt that wrong?
> If I destroy resources on the dtor, wouldn't it invalidate the 
> resource on the copy?
> Also, C++ behaves differently

No Sorry, it behaves almost the same.
just in D ctor and dtor are not called on declaration even if you 
drop " = void".


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list