DIP 1009--Improve Contract Usability--Preliminary Review Round 2 Begins

[Moritz Maxeiner via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 21 July 2017 at 18:35:53 UTC, David Gileadi wrote:
> On 7/21/17 6:51 AM, Mike Parker wrote:
>> DIP 1009 is titled "Improve Contract Usability".
>
> For out contracts that use the return identifier, could the 
> keyword "return" be used?
>
>     out(return > 0)
>
> One possible problem with this syntax is a future where 
> functions could have multiple return values...

No, see Round 1 discussion [1]

[1] http://forum.dlang.org/post/oihbot$134s$1@digitalmars.com